Monday, May 12, 2008

Histories of the Writing Center

Today in class Karen and Michelle's group talked about the stigma of writing centers; that is, they talked about how often students view the writing center as a place for those who are not smart, which is something the authors of today's readings address. Particularly, Carino notes that the break from the classrom "fostered the view of the lab as a venue for the inferior student" (17). However, none of the readings for today talk in depth about how the writing lab or clinic was advertised to its students. I wonder how those who were apart of the earlier labs or clinics marketed them to the students. I wonder what these histories would look like juxtaposed with a history of how these labs and clinics were marketed. For instance, what would these histories say if the earlier clinics and labs did not make an overt attempt to encourage students of all abilities to participate?

2 comments:

Carolyn A. Jones said...

I think the remedial stigma is still present. I wonder how we might make writing centers more like professional writing groups in image.

jrgm said...

I found the line you quote from Carino interesting, too. I did a conference presentation on the advertising here at BSU over the years. I'll see if I can find that...

What I think is really interesting about advertising is that it is an outward expression of intention and identity. It says: this is who we are. So, I agree with you that if the centers were saying "we help remedial students," we shouldn't be surprised when that is how the place became labeled.